Fill in Your Da 2166 9 1 Template

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can seem daunting, but understanding its key components makes the process smoother. Here are some essential takeaways to keep in mind:

• Accurate Information is Crucial: Ensure that all personal details, such as name, SSN, and rank, are entered correctly. Mistakes can lead to delays or issues with the evaluation.
• Understand the Purpose: This form serves as an NCO Evaluation Report for Sergeants, providing a comprehensive overview of performance and potential.
• Know the Required Dates: Fill in the period covered by the evaluation accurately. This includes start and end dates, which are essential for tracking performance over time.
• Rater and Senior Rater Roles: The form requires signatures from both the rater and the senior rater. Each plays a crucial role in assessing the NCO's performance.
• Performance Evaluation Sections: Pay close attention to the areas of evaluation, such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. These sections require specific comments based on observed behaviors.
• Be Mindful of Counseling Dates: Document the initial and any subsequent counseling dates accurately. This shows that the NCO has received feedback and guidance throughout the evaluation period.
• Use of Email Addresses: Include the email addresses for the rater, senior rater, and supplementary reviewer. This facilitates communication and verification.
• Supplementary Review: If applicable, ensure that the supplementary reviewer’s information is filled out completely. Their input can provide additional insights into the NCO’s performance.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO must understand that their signature does not indicate agreement with the evaluation but confirms the accuracy of the administrative data and awareness of the appeals process.

By keeping these points in mind, you can navigate the DA 2166-9-1 form with confidence and ensure that the evaluation process is thorough and effective.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, consider the following guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance.

• Do provide accurate personal information, including your name, SSN, and rank.
• Do ensure that all dates are formatted correctly (YYYYMMDD).
• Do double-check the duty description for completeness and clarity.
• Do confirm that all email addresses provided are valid (.gov or .mil).
• Do review the performance evaluation section thoroughly before submission.
• Don't leave any required fields blank; every section must be filled out.
• Don't use abbreviations or jargon that may confuse the reviewers.
• Don't forget to sign and date the form where required.
• Don't submit the form without ensuring all enclosures are attached, if applicable.

1. Incomplete Personal Information: Failing to provide all necessary details, such as the full name, Social Security Number (SSN), or rank, can lead to delays or complications.

2. Incorrect Dates: Entering the wrong dates for rank or the period covered can result in inaccurate evaluations. Double-check all date entries.

3. Missing Email Addresses: Not including the required email addresses for the rated NCO, rater, or senior rater can hinder communication and verification processes.

4. Improper Duty Description: Providing vague or incomplete descriptions of daily duties and areas of special emphasis can lead to misunderstandings about the NCO's responsibilities.

5. Neglecting Counseling Dates: Failing to document the counseling dates accurately can create confusion regarding the evaluation process and expectations.

6. Ignoring Performance Evaluation Standards: Not addressing the specific standards for performance evaluation, such as character and presence, may result in an incomplete assessment.

7. Overlooking Signatures: Forgetting to obtain the necessary signatures from the rater, senior rater, or supplementary reviewer can invalidate the report.

8. Failing to Review the Completed Report: Not reviewing the completed evaluation before signing can lead to agreeing to inaccuracies or omissions.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the DA Form 67-9, which is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). Both forms serve the purpose of evaluating an individual's performance within the Army. While the 2166-9-1 focuses on Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), the 67-9 is tailored for officers. Each form includes sections for administrative data, performance evaluations, and the signatures of the rater and senior rater. This structure ensures a consistent evaluation process across ranks, highlighting the importance of leadership and accountability in the Army.

Another related document is the DA Form 1059, which is the Academic Evaluation Report. This form evaluates soldiers who have completed training courses. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it assesses performance and potential, but it does so in the context of educational achievements. Both forms require input from evaluators and provide a comprehensive overview of a soldier's capabilities, reinforcing the commitment to professional development within the military.

The DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form, is also comparable. This document is used to document counseling sessions between a leader and a soldier. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, it includes sections for goals, performance, and areas for improvement. Both forms aim to foster communication and development, ensuring that soldiers receive the guidance necessary for career advancement and personal growth.

The New York DTF-84 form is an application for Qualified Empire Zone Enterprise (QEZE) Sales Tax Certification, designed for businesses recognized by Empire State Development. This form is essential for companies that aim to receive sales tax benefits, provided they meet specific eligibility requirements. It is crucial to submit the completed form along with the necessary documentation to ensure proper processing and access to the available tax benefits. For more information, visit https://nytemplates.com.

The DA Form 7000, which is the Army’s Financial Liability Investigation of Property Loss, shares a focus on accountability. Although it deals with financial matters rather than performance, both forms require detailed information and signatures from responsible parties. They emphasize the importance of maintaining standards and taking responsibility for one's actions within the Army.

The DA Form 4187, or the Personnel Action form, is another document that has similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1. While the 4187 is used for various personnel actions, such as promotions or transfers, it also requires detailed information about the soldier's background and performance. Both forms contribute to the soldier's career trajectory and reflect the Army’s commitment to maintaining accurate records and evaluations.

Additionally, the DA Form 7500, the Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATRRS) Enrollment Form, is relevant. This form tracks soldiers' training and development opportunities. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it aims to enhance a soldier's skills and qualifications, ensuring that they are prepared for future challenges. Both documents play a vital role in the professional development of Army personnel.

Lastly, the DA Form 11-2, which is the Commander's Evaluation Report, is similar in that it evaluates the effectiveness of leaders within a unit. While the 2166-9-1 focuses on individual NCOs, the 11-2 assesses the overall command climate and leadership effectiveness. Both forms include feedback from multiple sources, highlighting the importance of comprehensive evaluations in fostering a strong and effective military environment.